2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1982 Citroen BX

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen BX would be higher. At 4,299 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1982 Citroen BX. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen BX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 814 kg more than 1982 Citroen BX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen BX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen BX. (122 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen BX.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Blazer 1982 Citroen BX
Make Chevrolet Citroen
Model Blazer BX
Year Released 2005 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4299 cc 1905 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 190 HP 71 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 339 Nm 122 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.4 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.2:1 23.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1800 kg 986 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4240 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2660 mm