2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1983 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 482 kg more than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (149 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 1983 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Blazer | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4292 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 149 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2620 mm |