2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1989 Citroen XM
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (108 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 235 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (235 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 1989 Citroen XM | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Blazer | XM |
Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4292 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 235 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 21.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1337 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 80 L |