2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 270 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 1996 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Blazer | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4292 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 296 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1302 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 77 L |