2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1999 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Toyota MR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Toyota MR2 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (191 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1999 Toyota MR2. (140 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1999 Toyota MR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 744 kg more than 1999 Toyota MR2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Toyota MR2. (183 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 1999 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Blazer | MR2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 183 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 91.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 48 L |