2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 332 kg more than 2000 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 626. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Blazer | 626 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4292 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 150 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 64 L |