2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2001 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar XJ220 weights approximately 138 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (1,077 Nm) has 738 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2001 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2001 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
| Model | Blazer | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4292 cc | 3492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 1077 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2230 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2720 mm |
