2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2002 Daewoo Evanda
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Evanda would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (131 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 137 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (181 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2002 Daewoo Evanda | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daewoo |
Model | Blazer | Evanda |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4292 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 65 L |