2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2002 Opel Omega
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Opel Omega would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (191 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2002 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2002 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 19 kg more than 2002 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Opel Omega. (209 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2002 Opel Omega | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Blazer | Omega |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 209 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 94.6 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 75 L |