2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (191 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 69 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XJ.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2003 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2003 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
| Model | Blazer | XJ |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 294 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 411 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 90.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 85 L |
