2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2003 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (191 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2003 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2003 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 869 kg more than 2003 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Smart ForTwo. (96 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2003 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | Blazer | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 96 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 67 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 33 L |