2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2004 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XJ (300 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (191 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 45 kg more than 2004 Jaguar XJ.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XJ (420 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2004 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Blazer | XJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 420 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1639 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 16 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 85 L |