2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2005 Toyota RunX
To start off, both 2005 Chevrolet Blazer and 2005 Toyota RunX were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (191 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2005 Toyota RunX. (187 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota RunX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 506 kg more than 2005 Toyota RunX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota RunX. (180 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2005 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Blazer | RunX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 11.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1178 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |