2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2007 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2007 Volvo XC90 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2007 Volvo XC90. (183 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2007 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 608 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Volvo XC90 (400 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2007 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2007 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Blazer | XC90 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4292 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 400 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 17.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |