2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2008 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2008 GMC Yukon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 GMC Yukon (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 GMC Yukon weights approximately 569 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 GMC Yukon (498 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2008 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2008 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Chevrolet | GMC |
Model | Blazer | Yukon |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4292 cc | 5999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 332 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 498 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 2141 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 98 L |