2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2008 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-7 (256 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (191 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-7 weights approximately 11 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-7 (380 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2008 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Blazer | CX-7 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 87.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 65 L |