2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2009 Chrysler Aspen
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (191 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. (330 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2009 Chrysler Aspen | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Blazer | Aspen |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 299 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 57 L |