2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2009 Ford E-150
To start off, 2009 Ford E-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (191 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 718 kg more than 2009 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-150 (389 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2009 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2009 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Blazer | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 4606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 389 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 6030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 132 L |
