2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2010 Acura ZDX
To start off, 2010 Acura ZDX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura ZDX (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura ZDX should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura ZDX weights approximately 428 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Acura ZDX (366 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2010 Acura ZDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 2010 Acura ZDX | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
| Model | Blazer | ZDX |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4292 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4887 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1994 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1595 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2751 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 79 L |
