2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2012 Mazda 3

To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,299 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (113 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.

Because 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 3. (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Blazer 2012 Mazda 3
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Blazer 3
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4299 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 190 HP 113 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 339 Nm 270 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 1750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2639 mm