2005 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 164 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier (203 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Cavalier | Tempo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 112 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1274 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2540 mm |