2005 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier (140 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 42 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier (203 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
| Model | Cavalier | CJ |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2380 mm |
