2005 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 29 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 2013 Mini Cooper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mini Cooper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier (203 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (155 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Cavalier | Cooper |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1214 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3723 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1407 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.5 L/100km | 5.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.1 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 50 L |
