2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1956 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (146 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Because 1956 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1956 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Cobalt | 12 M |
Year Released | 2005 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2500 mm |