2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (140 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 385 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1963 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Cobalt | Munga |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 76.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 31 L |