2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1964 Holden EK
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (140 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (203 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1964 Holden EK | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Cobalt | EK |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 65 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
