2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (140 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 735 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (203 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Cobalt | Fronte |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 81 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 66 L |