2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1972 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Mustang (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt. (145 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Mustang weights approximately 107 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Mustang (385 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Cobalt 1972 Ford Mustang
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Cobalt Mustang
Year Released 2005 1972
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2196 cc 5753 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 145 HP 178 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 385 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 94.6 mm 88.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 8.6:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1420 kg 1527 kg
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 4820 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2780 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 49 L 87 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]