2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1972 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (146 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 440 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (210 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1972 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cobalt | Colt |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2360 mm |
