2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1973 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1973 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1973 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Chevrolet | Plymouth |
Model | Cobalt | Valiant |
Year Released | 2005 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 3246 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2830 mm |