2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1975 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1975 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (146 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1975 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1975 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 140 kg more than 1975 NSU Ro 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (210 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 NSU Ro 80. (163 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1975 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Chevrolet | NSU |
Model | Cobalt | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1975 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 163 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 37 L |