2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 21 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Because 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cobalt | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1459 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2760 mm |