2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 15 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cobalt | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2760 mm |