2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (145 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 763 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt (203 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1998 Rover Mini | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Cobalt | Mini |
Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 94 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1459 kg | 696 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2750 mm |