2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt. (140 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 305 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Cobalt | F-Type |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2390 mm |