2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Because 2010 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Cobalt | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2490 mm |