2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 147 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Colorado | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1950 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 164 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 6.4:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1713 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3690 mm |
