2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1952 Holden FX

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 743 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Colorado 1952 Holden FX
Make Chevrolet Holden
Model Colorado FX
Year Released 2005 1952
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2770 cc 2166 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 175 HP 51 HP
Torque 251 Nm 136 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Vehicle Weight 1713 kg 970 kg
Vehicle Length 5270 mm 4380 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1720 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 3210 mm 2620 mm