2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 908 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Colorado | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2768 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 53 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 85.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1573 kg | 665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 33 L |
