2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 413 kg more than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Studebaker |
| Model | Colorado | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1713 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2980 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 68 L |
