2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 459 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Colorado | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2769 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 150 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 54 L |