2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1964 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1964 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 401 kg more than 1964 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Zodiac. (191 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 1964 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | Zodiac |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2769 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 191 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 79.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 45 L |