2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 776 kg more than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Chevrolet | Reliant |
Model | Colorado | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2768 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 185 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1573 kg | 797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 38 L |