2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1994 Rover 800
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 800 would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1994 Rover 800. (167 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 49 kg more than 1994 Rover 800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 800. (225 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 800.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 1994 Rover 800 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Colorado | 800 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2768 cc | 2675 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 225 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1573 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 68 L |