2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (150 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 169 kg more than 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (249 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Colorado | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2768 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 249 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1573 kg | 1404 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 76 L |