2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1999 Citroen XM
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1999 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1999 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 391 kg more than 1999 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Citroen XM. (174 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 1999 Citroen XM | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Colorado | XM |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2769 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 66 L |