2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2002 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 53 kg more than 2002 Ford GT 40.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2002 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | GT 40 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2768 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 95.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 72.9 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1573 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 107 L |