2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2003 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford C-MAX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford C-MAX would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (144 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 181 kg more than 2003 Ford C-MAX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (344 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2003 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | C-MAX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2768 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 344 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1573 kg | 1392 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 132 L |