2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 2,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 837 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (103 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Colorado | R2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2769 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 103 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 834 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 30 L |