2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 931 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
| Model | Colorado | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2769 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 1810 mm |
